Difference between revisions of "Talk:Programming Guidelines"
From Dreamwidth Notes
(→dw-nonfree suggested header: new section) |
(removed other headers to move to their own page) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:Pauamma|Pauamma]] 09:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC) | [[User:Pauamma|Pauamma]] 09:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
− | + | (LJFUNC should die and we should use something that the rest of the world uses, POD. [[User:Xb95|Xb95]] today when I wrote this) | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + |
Latest revision as of 08:24, 4 August 2009
A few things:
- I like 80 as the line length limit, not 120. (I can see a point for a longer limit in actual statements, which may be what you meant, but for comments, 80 is (IMO) better.)
- "&foo;" should probably be rewritten as "foo();" unless there's a reason why it needs to remain that way. (And if there's a reason, it should be explained in code.)
- There should be a reference for <LJFUNC> function interface definitions. Or a decision to do away with them. If we keep them, adding them should probably be an ongoing clean-up task.
Pauamma 09:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
(LJFUNC should die and we should use something that the rest of the world uses, POD. Xb95 today when I wrote this)