Difference between revisions of "Style Pros and Cons/Notepad"
From Dreamwidth Notes
Azurelunatic (Talk | contribs) (→Pros) |
Foxfirefey (Talk | contribs) m (S2 and Journal Styles/Notepad moved to Style Pros and Cons/Notepad) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Pros == | == Pros == | ||
* It looks kind of cool, doesn't it? | * It looks kind of cool, doesn't it? | ||
| + | : No. | ||
== Cons == | == Cons == | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
* That blue background behind the notepad. | * That blue background behind the notepad. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * it looks like somebody mated a GeoCities page with HTML email stationery from 1998. | ||
[[Category: Styles Pros and Cons|Notepad]] | [[Category: Styles Pros and Cons|Notepad]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:47, 30 January 2009
Notepad
Pros
- It looks kind of cool, doesn't it?
- No.
Cons
- Exceedingly uncustomizable -- it's essentially a one-trick pony, and any other designs, etc, look like hammered dogshit.
- That blue background behind the notepad.
- it looks like somebody mated a GeoCities page with HTML email stationery from 1998.
