Difference between revisions of "LJ features not in Dreamwidth"

From Dreamwidth Notes
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added Singles to the list)
m (Singles)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
== Singles ==
 
== Singles ==
  
Brad isn't trying to get laid, so it's not needed.
+
We're not in the business of getting Brad laid.
  
 
[[Category: Brainstorming]]
 
[[Category: Brainstorming]]
 
[[Category: Development]]
 
[[Category: Development]]
 
[[Category: Dreamwidth.org]]
 
[[Category: Dreamwidth.org]]

Revision as of 10:29, 15 January 2009

Some features LJ has aren't going to be available in Dreamwidth, at least at launch.

S1

Maintaining and documenting S1 is a lot of work.

Photo hosting

Technical reasons; hope to add eventually with better service integration.

Todo

Never came out of beta on LJ, not much interest.

Phone posts

Expense, would need to rewrite the technology. Someday.

TxtLJ

Same as phone posts.

Snap.com previews

Better off dead. People who like them can install Snap.com's technology on their browser anyway.

Singles

We're not in the business of getting Brad laid.