Difference between revisions of "User relationships"

From Dreamwidth Notes
Jump to: navigation, search
(moar formatting)
(more consistent descriptions, room for commentary)
Line 1: Line 1:
The main user is User X.  User Y is someone who User X has some kind of relationship to--note that this can include things like User Y subscribing to X, but X has nothing to do with them.
+
The user being considered here is User X.  User Y is someone who User X has some kind of relationship to--note that this can include things like User Y subscribing to X, but X has nothing to do with them.
  
 
== DW Relationship Table ==
 
== DW Relationship Table ==
Line 7: Line 7:
 
<tr><th></th><th></th><th>Subscribe</th><th>Access</th><th>Both</th><th>Neither</th></tr>
 
<tr><th></th><th></th><th>Subscribe</th><th>Access</th><th>Both</th><th>Neither</th></tr>
 
<tr><th rowspan="4">User Y</th><th>Subscribe</th>
 
<tr><th rowspan="4">User Y</th><th>Subscribe</th>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYS</div>Mutual subscriptions; X and Y subscribe to each other, but don't give each other access.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYS</div>Mutual subscriptions; X and Y subscribe to each other but do not give each other access.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYS</div>X lets Y access their stuff, and Y subscribes to X , but X  doesn't subscribe to Y.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYS</div>X gives access to Y and Y subscribes to X, but Y does not give X access.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYS</div>X gives access to and subscribes to Y, but Y only subscribes to X and does not give them access.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYS</div>X subscribes and gives access to Y, but Y only subscribes to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYS</div>Y subscribes to X , but X  doesn't subscribe or give access to Y.</td></tr>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYS</div>X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes to X.</td></tr>
 
<tr><th>Access</th>
 
<tr><th>Access</th>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYA</div>Y gives access to X and X  subscribes to Y, but Y doesn't subscribe to X .</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYA</div>X subscribes to Y, and Y gives access to X, but Y does not subscribe to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYA</div>Mutual access; X and Y give each other access, but neither subscribes to the other.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYA</div>Mutual access; X and Y give each other access, but neither subscribes to the other.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYA</div>X subscribes to Y and gives them access, but Y only gives access to Y and doesn't subscribe.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYA</div>X subscribes to Y and gives them access, but Y only gives access to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYA</div>Y gives X access, but X  does not subscribe or give access to Y.</td></tr>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYA</div>X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y gives access to X.</td></tr>
 
<tr><th>Both</th>
 
<tr><th>Both</th>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYB</div>Y gives access to and subscribes to X , but X  only subscribes to Y and does not give them access.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYB</div>X only subscribes to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYB</div>Y subscribes to X and gives them access, but X  only gives access to Y and doesn't subscribe.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYB</div>X only gives access to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYB</div>The equivalent of "friending" on LJ--X and Y both subscribe and give each other access.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYB</div>X and Y both subscribe and give access to each other.  The equivalent of friending on LJ.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYB</div>Y both subscribes and gives access to X , but X  doesn't subscribe or give access to Y.</td></tr>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYB</div>X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes and gives access to X.</td></tr>
 
<tr><th>Neither</th>
 
<tr><th>Neither</th>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYN</div>X subscribes to Y, but Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X .</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XSYN</div>X subscribes to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYN</div>X gives Y access, but X  does not subscribe or give access to Y.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XAYN</div>X gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYN</div>X both subscribes and gives access to Y, but Y doesn't subscribe or give access to Y.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XBYN</div>X both subscribes and gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYN</div>X and Y have no direct connections.</td></tr>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYN</div>X and Y have no direct connections.</td></tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
 +
 +
== Commentary on specific patterns, pre-launch ==
 +
 +
=== XSYS ===
 +
 +
<em>Mutual subscriptions; X and Y subscribe to each other but do not give each other access.</em>
 +
 +
This should be a decently common pattern; many people might want to watch and read each other's public material, but not go into the locked material.
 +
 +
=== XAYS ===
 +
 +
<em>X gives access to Y and Y subscribes to X, but Y does not give X access.</em>
 +
 +
An instance of this usage pattern would be X as a reader of author Y's content.  Author Y keeps all of their content locked from the general public, but gives access to interested readers.  However, Author Y doesn't want to read everyone who is reading them.
 +
 +
=== XBYS ===
 +
 +
<em>X subscribes and gives access to Y, but Y only subscribes to X.</em>
 +
 +
This could be an effect of different usage or comfort levels for locked content between two users.  X might be more willing to share their locked content than Y.  Y might reserve locked content access to only a given few.
 +
 +
=== XNYS ===
 +
 +
<em>X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes to X.</em>
 +
 +
Popular writers could have many instances of this pattern: they write interesting material that Y wants to read, but X isn't a reader of Y.  X only wants to read Y, however, not give Y access to their locked content. This is probably the pattern that drove the split from friends into subscribe and access.
 +
 +
=== XSYA ===
 +
 +
<em>X subscribes to Y, and Y gives access to X, but Y does not subscribe to X.</em>
 +
 +
Like [[User relationships#XAYS|XAYS]], but in reverse.
 +
 +
=== XAYA ===
 +
 +
<em>Mutual access; X and Y give each other access, but neither subscribes to the other.</em>
 +
 +
=== XBYA ===
 +
 +
<em>X subscribes to Y and gives them access, but Y only gives access to X.</em>
 +
 +
Pattern might occur when somebody does a "friends cut" when previously mutual friends, where they don't care as much about who is reading their locked content as much as not having as much content to read.  In this instance, Y is doing the cut down, while X still reads and gives access to Y.
 +
 +
=== XNYA ===
 +
 +
<em>X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y gives access to X.</em>
 +
 +
=== XSYB ===
 +
 +
<em>X only subscribes to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.</em>
 +
 +
Differing comfort levels or usage of locked content, like [[User relationships#XBYS|XBYS]], but in reverse.
 +
 +
=== XAYB ===
 +
 +
<em>X only gives access to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.</em>
 +
 +
Just like [[User relationships#XBYA|XBYA]], except reversed.
 +
 +
=== XBYB ===
 +
 +
<em>X and Y both subscribe and give access to each other. The equivalent of friending on LJ.</em>
 +
 +
Expected to be a very popular pattern, since mutual friending on LJ is the norm.
 +
 +
=== XNYB ===
 +
 +
<em>X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes and gives access to X.</em>
 +
 +
=== XSYN ===
 +
 +
<em>X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes and gives access to X.</em>
 +
 +
Like [[User relationships#XNYS|XNYS]], but in reverse.
 +
 +
=== XAYN ===
 +
 +
<em>X gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.</em>
 +
 +
Like [[User relationships#XNYA|XNYA]], but in reverse.
 +
 +
=== XBYN ===
 +
 +
<em>X both subscribes and gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.</em>
 +
 +
Like [[User relationships#XNYB|XNYB]], but in reverse.
 +
 +
=== XNYN ===
 +
 +
<em>X and Y have no direct connections.</em>
 +
 +
At least...no unCOVERT connections.
  
 
== LJ Relationship Table ==
 
== LJ Relationship Table ==
Line 38: Line 130:
 
<th>Friend</th>
 
<th>Friend</th>
 
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XFYF</div>X and Y have friended each other.</td>
 
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XFYF</div>X and Y have friended each other.</td>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYF</div>Y is friends with X, but X is not friends with Y.</td></tr>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYF</div>X is not friends with Y, but Y has friended X.</td></tr>
 
<tr><th>Not Friend</th>
 
<tr><th>Not Friend</th>
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XFYN</div>X is friends with Y, but X is not friends with Y.</td>
+
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XFYN</div>X has friended Y, but Y has not friended X.</td>
 
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYN</div>X and Y have no direct connections.</td>
 
<td valign="top"><div style="float: right; font-style: italic; font-size: small;">XNYN</div>X and Y have no direct connections.</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>

Revision as of 00:48, 21 February 2009

The user being considered here is User X. User Y is someone who User X has some kind of relationship to--note that this can include things like User Y subscribing to X, but X has nothing to do with them.

DW Relationship Table

User X
SubscribeAccessBothNeither
User YSubscribe
XSYS
Mutual subscriptions; X and Y subscribe to each other but do not give each other access.
XAYS
X gives access to Y and Y subscribes to X, but Y does not give X access.
XBYS
X subscribes and gives access to Y, but Y only subscribes to X.
XNYS
X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes to X.
Access
XSYA
X subscribes to Y, and Y gives access to X, but Y does not subscribe to X.
XAYA
Mutual access; X and Y give each other access, but neither subscribes to the other.
XBYA
X subscribes to Y and gives them access, but Y only gives access to X.
XNYA
X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y gives access to X.
Both
XSYB
X only subscribes to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.
XAYB
X only gives access to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.
XBYB
X and Y both subscribe and give access to each other. The equivalent of friending on LJ.
XNYB
X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes and gives access to X.
Neither
XSYN
X subscribes to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.
XAYN
X gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.
XBYN
X both subscribes and gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.
XNYN
X and Y have no direct connections.

Commentary on specific patterns, pre-launch

XSYS

Mutual subscriptions; X and Y subscribe to each other but do not give each other access.

This should be a decently common pattern; many people might want to watch and read each other's public material, but not go into the locked material.

XAYS

X gives access to Y and Y subscribes to X, but Y does not give X access.

An instance of this usage pattern would be X as a reader of author Y's content. Author Y keeps all of their content locked from the general public, but gives access to interested readers. However, Author Y doesn't want to read everyone who is reading them.

XBYS

X subscribes and gives access to Y, but Y only subscribes to X.

This could be an effect of different usage or comfort levels for locked content between two users. X might be more willing to share their locked content than Y. Y might reserve locked content access to only a given few.

XNYS

X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes to X.

Popular writers could have many instances of this pattern: they write interesting material that Y wants to read, but X isn't a reader of Y. X only wants to read Y, however, not give Y access to their locked content. This is probably the pattern that drove the split from friends into subscribe and access.

XSYA

X subscribes to Y, and Y gives access to X, but Y does not subscribe to X.

Like XAYS, but in reverse.

XAYA

Mutual access; X and Y give each other access, but neither subscribes to the other.

XBYA

X subscribes to Y and gives them access, but Y only gives access to X.

Pattern might occur when somebody does a "friends cut" when previously mutual friends, where they don't care as much about who is reading their locked content as much as not having as much content to read. In this instance, Y is doing the cut down, while X still reads and gives access to Y.

XNYA

X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y gives access to X.

XSYB

X only subscribes to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.

Differing comfort levels or usage of locked content, like XBYS, but in reverse.

XAYB

X only gives access to Y, while Y subscribes and gives access to X.

Just like XBYA, except reversed.

XBYB

X and Y both subscribe and give access to each other. The equivalent of friending on LJ.

Expected to be a very popular pattern, since mutual friending on LJ is the norm.

XNYB

X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes and gives access to X.

XSYN

X doesn't subscribe or give access to Y, but Y subscribes and gives access to X.

Like XNYS, but in reverse.

XAYN

X gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.

Like XNYA, but in reverse.

XBYN

X both subscribes and gives access to Y, while Y doesn't subscribe or give access to X.

Like XNYB, but in reverse.

XNYN

X and Y have no direct connections.

At least...no unCOVERT connections.

LJ Relationship Table

This is for comparison--relationships on LJ are much simpler!

User X
FriendNot Friend
User Y Friend
XFYF
X and Y have friended each other.
XNYF
X is not friends with Y, but Y has friended X.
Not Friend
XFYN
X has friended Y, but Y has not friended X.
XNYN
X and Y have no direct connections.