Difference between revisions of "Talk:Styles Wishlist"

From Dreamwidth Notes
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Ideally we want none, but since we're inheriting a lot of historical table-based layouts, the styles team is prioritizing how they update them. --[[User:Rahaeli|Rahaeli]] 17:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 
Ideally we want none, but since we're inheriting a lot of historical table-based layouts, the styles team is prioritizing how they update them. --[[User:Rahaeli|Rahaeli]] 17:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
My goals do not include any table-based layouts, although many will have table-based calendars.  However, eventually we'd like to convert the non-LJ table based layouts to CSS-based.  [[User:Aveleh|Aveleh]] 18:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:17, 9 February 2009

As few table-based layouts as possible. Do we need any table-based layouts? Their benefits are overwhelmingly beaten by their negatives, especially from an accessibility perspective. Jadelennox 20:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Ideally we want none, but since we're inheriting a lot of historical table-based layouts, the styles team is prioritizing how they update them. --Rahaeli 17:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

My goals do not include any table-based layouts, although many will have table-based calendars. However, eventually we'd like to convert the non-LJ table based layouts to CSS-based. Aveleh 18:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)